By Ugo Inyama
A Nigerian can switch cash on a telephone and obtain affirmation inside seconds. Yet after spending hours within the solar to vote, the identical particular person might spend days trying to find their polling unit consequence and questioning whether or not it entered the ultimate rely.
An election is extra difficult than a financial institution switch. Nobody disputes that. But a citizen who has voted deserves to know what occurred afterwards.
That is the query INEC should reply earlier than 2027.
On election morning, individuals go away their properties with hope. Some arrive earlier than the officers. They look forward to supplies, endure the warmth and stay affected person when voting begins late. Many keep behind for the counting as a result of they wish to hear the figures themselves.
The votes are counted. Results are introduced. Party brokers acquire their copies. At that time, everybody current is aware of what occurred at that polling unit.
Then the consequence leaves.
It passes by way of collation centres, the place figures are added collectively till a winner emerges. This is the place many Nigerians start to fret. Will the figures stay the identical? Will the consequence seem on the portal? If one thing adjustments, will anybody clarify why?
People shouldn’t should depend on a celebration spokesman to inform them whether or not their votes counted. They ought to be capable to test.
We have spent too many elections arguing about what occurred between the polling unit and the ultimate declaration. That uncertainty offers room to individuals who manipulate outcomes. It additionally permits candidates who lose pretty to make allegations they can’t assist.
A course of that folks can observe would assist expose each.
Before the 2023 elections, BVAS and the INEC Result Viewing Portal raised expectations. Nigerians hoped expertise would make it more durable to change outcomes with out leaving proof.
When presidential consequence uploads have been delayed, voters saved refreshing the portal. They needed to see the outcomes that they had watched officers rely. The absence of that info created anxiousness, and explanations struggled to beat the suspicion that adopted.
INEC ought to take that have severely. Public confidence is troublesome to get better as soon as individuals consider they’ve been misled.
The Electoral Act 2026 requires digital transmission of polling unit outcomes to IReV after the prescribed signing and stamping of Form EC8A. Where communication failure makes transmission not possible, the signed paper kind stays the first supply for collation and declaration. (placng.org)
That fallback wants clear procedures.
Who information the failure? Who verifies what occurred? What proof is retained? How is the paper consequence protected whereas transmission stays not possible?
These questions ought to be answered earlier than election day, when there’s time to look at the preparations calmly.
Anyone who makes use of a telephone in Nigeria is aware of that community issues are actual. But as a result of they’re acquainted, they need to be deliberate for. INEC ought to show how officers will retain outcomes, file tried uploads and account for delays.
“Network failure” ought to start an evidence, somewhat than shut the matter.
Buying tools is just a part of the job. Officials should know how one can use it, observe the procedures and account for his or her choices. Where an official intentionally breaches these procedures, there have to be penalties.
INEC ought to publish its transmission and contingency preparations early, submit its methods to unbiased technical scrutiny and take a look at them below troublesome situations. Accredited observers and political events ought to have significant alternatives to look at the preparations, with applicable safety safeguards.
The particulars matter. A alternative system ought to be recorded. A correction ought to present the unique determine, who modified it and why. Polling unit outcomes ought to stay traceable as they transfer by way of collation.
Communication issues simply as a lot. If a system fails, INEC ought to determine the affected places, clarify the issue and supply common updates. Leaving individuals gazing a clean portal invitations rumours, particularly when political tensions are already excessive.
The Commission’s independence may even be examined when highly effective individuals demand exceptions. A governor might object. A celebration might apply strain. An influential candidate might desire a disputed consequence hurried by way of.
Officials should observe the identical guidelines whoever advantages.
Political events have their very own half to play. Too typically, they condemn conduct in a single state and defend it in one other. Their place is determined by whether or not they’re successful.
A celebration that calls for transparency should settle for what transparency reveals, together with defeat.
Vote shopping for requires the identical consistency. We readily condemn the voter who accepts cash, however what occurs to those that provide the funds and organise the acquisition? Accountability should attain them too.
Courts will stay essential. But Nigerians shouldn’t routinely have to attend for litigation to grasp how polling unit figures grew to become a declared consequence. The proof ought to be accessible whereas the method unfolds.
INEC can not persuade each dropping candidate to concede. It may give residents sufficient dependable info to evaluate the claims made of their title.
The one who stood within the solar has already fulfilled their accountability. INEC owes that voter a transparent account of what occurred subsequent.
By 2027, following a vote from the polling unit to the ultimate declaration ought to be an unusual a part of a Nigerian election.
*Ugo Inyama
Email: Ugo@africandgc.org
Website: www.africandgc.org
